The moonring effect may have been a motivating factor in building stone circles.
For one thing, it's dramatic -- (there was one this night where I live). For another, it is a portent of snow -- which can be of advantage to the hunter, and these societies hunted. They may also have fetishized the 'color' white, and seen snow as a purification of the land -- another visual effect that's easy to understand. They certainly made an issue of the moon, so anything that made the moon seem more powerful would have been of interest to them. It should be noted at the same time, though, that moonrings are always round -- whereas stone circles are not.
On a related subject, the cursuses may have been built as temples to comets. I believe these generally orbit close to the plane of the solar system, and so would appear to reach east or west. Most are also periodic, and it may have been they had a great-returning-comet, or two. To make it their own, (and to make themselves its), would require something.
0
The Moonring Effect & Stone Circles
Started by Anew, 5-Nov-2006 11:36
35 replies to this topic
#2
Nigel
-
- Registered
- 321 posts
Megalithomaniac
- Interests:Avebury/Silbury
Posted 9 November 2006 - 09:48
Two points -
Cursuses -
also tend to run SW - NE which is the prevailing direction of British tornados...
The Moon -
today is an extreme Northern moonrise event. Tonight at about ten to seven the moon is (allegedly) going to rise out of Silbury as viewed from The Sanctuary http://www.themodern....com/post/19965
Now that'll be a good picture!
Deliberate? I don't know.
Quite a coincidence? Definitely.
Cursuses -
also tend to run SW - NE which is the prevailing direction of British tornados...
The Moon -
today is an extreme Northern moonrise event. Tonight at about ten to seven the moon is (allegedly) going to rise out of Silbury as viewed from The Sanctuary http://www.themodern....com/post/19965
Now that'll be a good picture!
Deliberate? I don't know.
Quite a coincidence? Definitely.
#4
kevin.b
-
- Registered
- 521 posts
Megalithomaniac
Posted 9 November 2006 - 21:19
Nigel,
You say "Quite a coincidence" I say not at all.
If the moon rises out of Silbury , will it push all that stinking polystyrene out?
The alignments and positions are almost pre-determined, everything is symbiotic, you must look at all things at once, not just one thing in isolation.
The comets pathway, the same as the tornado, the same as the phases of the moon, all is one, all is symbiotic.
If instead of reguarding yourself as advanced, consider yourself as in the dark ages, trying to make sense of a far more enlightened era?
Consider a race , far more advanced than ourselves, dont be misled by tales of lizerds, but think of people who were well in advance of this time.
Able to manipulate gravity with ease, cut and shape all materials and manouvre them to assist in the manipulation of space, there would have been many more all around them who were almost backward, but an elite were super advanced, even by todays standards.
Then catastrophe, almost global wipeout, who would best adapt?
, not the elite, no the peasant, well capable of survival, but some elite would, possibly pre -warned and prepared, they would appear as gods?
They would have a knowledge almost gone, how to use natural materials to manipulate everything, what would they strive to do?
They would try with all their might to emulate the constructions that they knew so well, what would you do if this happened now?
Thus the megaliths were built, then a gradual decline into a deeper dark age, the elite almost perish and die off, the remaining ones have only a scant idea about the way the megaliths work, fast forward to now
, almost total ignorance?
Built for burial, what ballocks, built by advanced quantum physists, who would have laughed at einstein.
Taken over by those that didn't really understand, and led to religious mumbo jumbo.
Newton, and einstein were correct in their limited area, they are totally wrong in reality, try to forget what you have been so well drilled in.
The megaliths are remnants of advanced knowledge, the knowledge of space, space is everything, it creates matter, constantly pushing inwards proportionate to the density of the matter
Space is only positive and negative, seperate the two opposing forces, like a white knight and a black knight, and make sure they are in balance, then all will prosper, if the black knight becomes too strong, then death and destruction will engulf you.
If you drop the arrogance, and recognise that we are novices in this universal knowledge, then you can grasp Nikola Tesla, and the greatness of the megaliths, by this way , they will be recognised and honoured, instead of been bulldozed and raped.
The picture of the dump truck in Silbury is very revealing, they can't see the construction that is evident all around them, they are like crazed gold diggers, looking for the holy grail, when it is staring themselves in the face, total barbarians, we are.
Kevin
You say "Quite a coincidence" I say not at all.
If the moon rises out of Silbury , will it push all that stinking polystyrene out?
The alignments and positions are almost pre-determined, everything is symbiotic, you must look at all things at once, not just one thing in isolation.
The comets pathway, the same as the tornado, the same as the phases of the moon, all is one, all is symbiotic.
If instead of reguarding yourself as advanced, consider yourself as in the dark ages, trying to make sense of a far more enlightened era?
Consider a race , far more advanced than ourselves, dont be misled by tales of lizerds, but think of people who were well in advance of this time.
Able to manipulate gravity with ease, cut and shape all materials and manouvre them to assist in the manipulation of space, there would have been many more all around them who were almost backward, but an elite were super advanced, even by todays standards.
Then catastrophe, almost global wipeout, who would best adapt?
, not the elite, no the peasant, well capable of survival, but some elite would, possibly pre -warned and prepared, they would appear as gods?
They would have a knowledge almost gone, how to use natural materials to manipulate everything, what would they strive to do?
They would try with all their might to emulate the constructions that they knew so well, what would you do if this happened now?
Thus the megaliths were built, then a gradual decline into a deeper dark age, the elite almost perish and die off, the remaining ones have only a scant idea about the way the megaliths work, fast forward to now
, almost total ignorance?
Built for burial, what ballocks, built by advanced quantum physists, who would have laughed at einstein.
Taken over by those that didn't really understand, and led to religious mumbo jumbo.
Newton, and einstein were correct in their limited area, they are totally wrong in reality, try to forget what you have been so well drilled in.
The megaliths are remnants of advanced knowledge, the knowledge of space, space is everything, it creates matter, constantly pushing inwards proportionate to the density of the matter
Space is only positive and negative, seperate the two opposing forces, like a white knight and a black knight, and make sure they are in balance, then all will prosper, if the black knight becomes too strong, then death and destruction will engulf you.
If you drop the arrogance, and recognise that we are novices in this universal knowledge, then you can grasp Nikola Tesla, and the greatness of the megaliths, by this way , they will be recognised and honoured, instead of been bulldozed and raped.
The picture of the dump truck in Silbury is very revealing, they can't see the construction that is evident all around them, they are like crazed gold diggers, looking for the holy grail, when it is staring themselves in the face, total barbarians, we are.
Kevin
#5
Nigel
-
- Registered
- 321 posts
Megalithomaniac
- Interests:Avebury/Silbury
Posted 10 November 2006 - 08:42
If you drop the arrogance....
Hmmm.
All I said was the Silbury/lunar maximum alignment might be either deliberate or might be coincidental.
You seem to be saying that unless I accept it is deliberate then I'm arrogant.
OK, I'm arrogant as I still don't know.
Hmmm.
All I said was the Silbury/lunar maximum alignment might be either deliberate or might be coincidental.
You seem to be saying that unless I accept it is deliberate then I'm arrogant.
OK, I'm arrogant as I still don't know.
#6
kevin.b
-
- Registered
- 521 posts
Megalithomaniac
Posted 10 November 2006 - 10:46
Nigel,
I have never found you arrogant at all, it is my lack of words-smith that makes you feel I meant you personally.
I meant us all, we are super arrogant, to think we are the best evolved, that all before us have been below our standards,when in all probability we have descended into darkness over the last 10,000 years.
This very arrogant way of looking at the megaliths is why nobody can understand them, instead of looking down at them, made by hairy club carrying neandertals, look up to them as made by superior knowledge, gradually descending knowledge , that has left us gawping at them in amazement.
Everything I detect at the sites shows that they are machines, built for purpose, the level of the ability of the machines has lowered as you near now.
Religion has taken over from the reason why they were built.
The Normans appear to have re-grasped some of the knowledge and created their churchs and cathedrals along the lines of the knowledge.
I am not making any of what I detect up Nigel, it is merely what has been forgotten and not known by such as Newton and einstein, therefore they were working on incomplete knowledge and figures, if they were here now, I am confident they would start again and re-write.
It is so simple that even I can grasp it, so simple that it is not only invisable, but incomprehensible to all the educated peoples to even lower themselves to consider it.
The un-educated know it, fully embrace it, until they are educated into forgetting it.
It, is space, it is everywhere, you are in space, we are space men/women.
Space is a fluid composed of positive and negative.
The megaliths are machines to manipulate this to the betterment of all.
Each single stone is like its own world, the denser it is the more charge it can hold.
The earth is negative, life is positive.
Gravity is nothing like what you have been drilled into believing, it is a response between positive and negative electrical incoming space.
The lines I detect , and can pace out perfectly, are a type of eletrical linear carrier wave, upon them flows positie and negative charged space, constantly and dynamically flowing into mass, and creating everything.
The planet will expand , the resistance of the planet will raise as the density of the space varies, hence global warming that is cyclable.
The flow of incoming space varies as the other celestial bodies interfere with these flows through there own resistance, this is why all through history we have watched the celestial bodies so closely, before now, they knew why they were watching, we are so arrogant as to think we can simply carry on and nothing will upset the apple cart.
The almost predictable series of alignments out there will affect us, it alters what I detect daily, weekly , monthly and seasonally.
Because of the variance in the incoming space down various alignments, is why they needed to keep moving the stones and re-aligning them to gain the best charge.
Free energy, to all, has been available and used on this planet, not like the super arrogant idiots that now dwell there, and are burning up stored energy, that the space has fired in here in the past, there is not the slightest need, and they , the elite of this planet have known this , but their profits will tumble, at the same time the megaliths will arise again.
I doubt we would exist if they hadn,t tapped into space how they did, they created a balance at a time when everything went upside down.
There is no need to joust with me Nigel, I honour and come in praise of the megaliths, and often say " thank you to those who are now dust"
Kevin
I have never found you arrogant at all, it is my lack of words-smith that makes you feel I meant you personally.
I meant us all, we are super arrogant, to think we are the best evolved, that all before us have been below our standards,when in all probability we have descended into darkness over the last 10,000 years.
This very arrogant way of looking at the megaliths is why nobody can understand them, instead of looking down at them, made by hairy club carrying neandertals, look up to them as made by superior knowledge, gradually descending knowledge , that has left us gawping at them in amazement.
Everything I detect at the sites shows that they are machines, built for purpose, the level of the ability of the machines has lowered as you near now.
Religion has taken over from the reason why they were built.
The Normans appear to have re-grasped some of the knowledge and created their churchs and cathedrals along the lines of the knowledge.
I am not making any of what I detect up Nigel, it is merely what has been forgotten and not known by such as Newton and einstein, therefore they were working on incomplete knowledge and figures, if they were here now, I am confident they would start again and re-write.
It is so simple that even I can grasp it, so simple that it is not only invisable, but incomprehensible to all the educated peoples to even lower themselves to consider it.
The un-educated know it, fully embrace it, until they are educated into forgetting it.
It, is space, it is everywhere, you are in space, we are space men/women.
Space is a fluid composed of positive and negative.
The megaliths are machines to manipulate this to the betterment of all.
Each single stone is like its own world, the denser it is the more charge it can hold.
The earth is negative, life is positive.
Gravity is nothing like what you have been drilled into believing, it is a response between positive and negative electrical incoming space.
The lines I detect , and can pace out perfectly, are a type of eletrical linear carrier wave, upon them flows positie and negative charged space, constantly and dynamically flowing into mass, and creating everything.
The planet will expand , the resistance of the planet will raise as the density of the space varies, hence global warming that is cyclable.
The flow of incoming space varies as the other celestial bodies interfere with these flows through there own resistance, this is why all through history we have watched the celestial bodies so closely, before now, they knew why they were watching, we are so arrogant as to think we can simply carry on and nothing will upset the apple cart.
The almost predictable series of alignments out there will affect us, it alters what I detect daily, weekly , monthly and seasonally.
Because of the variance in the incoming space down various alignments, is why they needed to keep moving the stones and re-aligning them to gain the best charge.
Free energy, to all, has been available and used on this planet, not like the super arrogant idiots that now dwell there, and are burning up stored energy, that the space has fired in here in the past, there is not the slightest need, and they , the elite of this planet have known this , but their profits will tumble, at the same time the megaliths will arise again.
I doubt we would exist if they hadn,t tapped into space how they did, they created a balance at a time when everything went upside down.
There is no need to joust with me Nigel, I honour and come in praise of the megaliths, and often say " thank you to those who are now dust"
Kevin
#8
Pete G
-
- Guardians of the Stones
- 540 posts
Trilithon Connoisseur
- Gender:Male
- Location:Avebury, Wiltshire, UK
- Interests:Stone Circles, Henges, Earthworks. Astronomy.
Posted 13 November 2006 - 21:40
shiny, on 13 November 2006, 19:08, said:
Well, don't keep us in suspenders..........
Did the moon rise out of Silbury Hill?
Did anyone manage to photo the event?
Did the moon rise out of Silbury Hill?
Did anyone manage to photo the event?
No of course not. Nigels calculations were 180 degree's out.
The moon would have Set into Silbury as viewed from the Sanctuary but it was 1pm and not visible in daylight.
PeteG
#9
kevin.b
-
- Registered
- 521 posts
Megalithomaniac
Posted 13 November 2006 - 23:30
Nigel was 180 degrees out, wow, hes a surveyor?
If it did it would have squashed all that awfull polystyrene down.
Though the alignment is right, just watch for it popping back out.
180 degrees is a straight line, so what travels into the earth, simply pops back out at the same spot.
These surveyors are never wrong about alignments, but timing may be a little different?
You can't see the moon often in daylight, you can't see the moon at the other side of the earth.
But strange people called dowsers can, the moon simply creates a resistance to the flow of something.
The flow of this something is centred at one point where a green hill is sited, very precisely sited.
The archaeology of the hill is what is important, but they are not looking for it.
The very precise layers of alternating materials mean more than any gold.
They have raped and pillaged this hill looking for gold, when the true treasure was right in front of them all the time, but they can't see it, just as you can't see the moon, in daylight, or when its at the other side of the earth.
To SEE the moon on the other side of the earth, you need some other sort of sense, please come to your senses.
Kevin
If it did it would have squashed all that awfull polystyrene down.
Though the alignment is right, just watch for it popping back out.
180 degrees is a straight line, so what travels into the earth, simply pops back out at the same spot.
These surveyors are never wrong about alignments, but timing may be a little different?
You can't see the moon often in daylight, you can't see the moon at the other side of the earth.
But strange people called dowsers can, the moon simply creates a resistance to the flow of something.
The flow of this something is centred at one point where a green hill is sited, very precisely sited.
The archaeology of the hill is what is important, but they are not looking for it.
The very precise layers of alternating materials mean more than any gold.
They have raped and pillaged this hill looking for gold, when the true treasure was right in front of them all the time, but they can't see it, just as you can't see the moon, in daylight, or when its at the other side of the earth.
To SEE the moon on the other side of the earth, you need some other sort of sense, please come to your senses.
Kevin
#10
Pete G
-
- Guardians of the Stones
- 540 posts
Trilithon Connoisseur
- Gender:Male
- Location:Avebury, Wiltshire, UK
- Interests:Stone Circles, Henges, Earthworks. Astronomy.
Posted 14 November 2006 - 00:17
>Nigel was 180 degrees out, wow, hes a surveyor?
I think Nigel just got his orientations wrong, Moonset into silbury rather than moonrise out of.
>If it did it would have squashed all that awfull polystyrene down.
No. The moon is a long, long, long way away from the earth and doesn't actualy sink Into the earth.
>Though the alignment is right, just watch for it popping back out.
see above
>180 degrees is a straight line, so what travels into the earth, simply pops back out at the same spot.
No. 180 degrees is half a circle.
>These surveyors are never wrong about alignments, but timing may be a little different?
I beg to differ, surveyors are people and all people make mistakes from time to time.
>You can't see the moon often in daylight, you can't see the moon at the other side of the earth.
Well using the internet you can view it with webcams or via satellite links.
>But strange people called dowsers can, the moon simply creates a resistance to the flow of something.
>The flow of this something is centred at one point where a green hill is sited, very precisely sited.
I do not have a clue what you are talking about here.
>The archaeology of the hill is what is important, but they are not looking for it.
By They I take it you mean archaeologists? in which case you are wrong again.
>The very precise layers of alternating materials mean more than any gold.
I'm not sure what you mean by that as gold is a metal and its meaning is subjective.
>They have raped and pillaged this hill looking for gold, when the true treasure was right in front of them all >the time, but they can't see it, just as you can't see the moon, in daylight, or when its at the other side of >the earth.
>To SEE the moon on the other side of the earth, you need some other sort of sense, please come to your senses.
see above comment re moonviewing
Please try to use E-Prime when trying to explain things
E-Prime
I think Nigel just got his orientations wrong, Moonset into silbury rather than moonrise out of.
>If it did it would have squashed all that awfull polystyrene down.
No. The moon is a long, long, long way away from the earth and doesn't actualy sink Into the earth.
>Though the alignment is right, just watch for it popping back out.
see above
>180 degrees is a straight line, so what travels into the earth, simply pops back out at the same spot.
No. 180 degrees is half a circle.
>These surveyors are never wrong about alignments, but timing may be a little different?
I beg to differ, surveyors are people and all people make mistakes from time to time.
>You can't see the moon often in daylight, you can't see the moon at the other side of the earth.
Well using the internet you can view it with webcams or via satellite links.
>But strange people called dowsers can, the moon simply creates a resistance to the flow of something.
>The flow of this something is centred at one point where a green hill is sited, very precisely sited.
I do not have a clue what you are talking about here.
>The archaeology of the hill is what is important, but they are not looking for it.
By They I take it you mean archaeologists? in which case you are wrong again.
>The very precise layers of alternating materials mean more than any gold.
I'm not sure what you mean by that as gold is a metal and its meaning is subjective.
>They have raped and pillaged this hill looking for gold, when the true treasure was right in front of them all >the time, but they can't see it, just as you can't see the moon, in daylight, or when its at the other side of >the earth.
>To SEE the moon on the other side of the earth, you need some other sort of sense, please come to your senses.
see above comment re moonviewing
Please try to use E-Prime when trying to explain things
E-Prime
#11
Nigel
-
- Registered
- 321 posts
Megalithomaniac
- Interests:Avebury/Silbury
Posted 14 November 2006 - 07:24
"I think Nigel just got his orientations wrong, Moonset into silbury rather than moonrise out of"
Yes. Moonset into of course. I'd been tracking the recent moonsets in that orientation.
(And actually, had decided it would be rather too far North in all probability, though I'll never know now sadly)
"I beg to differ, surveyors are people and all people make mistakes from time to time."
Indeed. The thing about surveyors, if they draw a line its there for all to check, whereas Dowsers - well - they can say what they want.
Yes. Moonset into of course. I'd been tracking the recent moonsets in that orientation.
(And actually, had decided it would be rather too far North in all probability, though I'll never know now sadly)
"I beg to differ, surveyors are people and all people make mistakes from time to time."
Indeed. The thing about surveyors, if they draw a line its there for all to check, whereas Dowsers - well - they can say what they want.
#12
kevin.b
-
- Registered
- 521 posts
Megalithomaniac
Posted 14 November 2006 - 21:54
Pete G,
Having read through your suggested method of writing, it appears , perhaps to aleviate some of the miss understanding that arrives from too blunt a fact type comments, worthy of more reading, in attempting to include it in this reply, in a word, difficult.
Kevin
Having read through your suggested method of writing, it appears , perhaps to aleviate some of the miss understanding that arrives from too blunt a fact type comments, worthy of more reading, in attempting to include it in this reply, in a word, difficult.
Kevin
#13
kevin.b
-
- Registered
- 521 posts
Megalithomaniac
Posted 14 November 2006 - 23:04
Nigel,
The lines I waffle on about appear to be non visual to human retina, but the constructions that have been sited and aligned to these non visable lines are evident in abundance, that is of course by a dowsing method of attaining alignment.
Surveyors have obviously been employed to set out the basic groundplans of these constructions.
What is the preferred method of alignment for surveyors, that is to start the basic orientation of a building?
Is a compass bearing used from compass north?
As for level, is a mere bubble in a glass tube trusted, and what is level, seeing as the earth is a globe?
Is there a distance where level has to be re calculated, as I would forsee you ending up going out into space.
If compass North is used how do you accurately measure anything, as I understand compass North is constantly wandering about.
In the opinion of a surveyor, why are churchs commonly aligned along the aisle E/W, is there a common sense reason to do this?
We have jousted quite a lot over the term dead straight line, for a long time until you let slip that you were a surveyor, I had puzzled why you were so keen about my saying this, it became clear in a flash of course when you revealed your illustrious past, perhaps some things are meant to be, and as it is incumbant on me to prove about dead straight lines, I should come up against such a worthy person to have to prove to.
I look forward to the day when such proof can be presented to yourself, I have promised you it will, and it most definately will be.
Pete G, said that a straight line is half a circle, indeed this is a true statement, and as the moon glides around the earth, it will always bisect the earth in two at a precise spot, when this also directly aligns with the sun, so that a dead straight line is bisecting through all three globes, is the precise spot on the globes surface that will be very special.imo.
The Earth tips up and down on a reguler basis, so there will be several of these spots that are at the max/min points of this movement, would you consider that it is possible to draw these points of alignment on the globe, always remembering that it is spinning?
Each month, or bi-monthly, this spot will traverse up and down between the min/max points, have you ever heard of anyone carrying out such a survey?
Imagine , if these points matched anywhere that you are familer with.
Kevin
The lines I waffle on about appear to be non visual to human retina, but the constructions that have been sited and aligned to these non visable lines are evident in abundance, that is of course by a dowsing method of attaining alignment.
Surveyors have obviously been employed to set out the basic groundplans of these constructions.
What is the preferred method of alignment for surveyors, that is to start the basic orientation of a building?
Is a compass bearing used from compass north?
As for level, is a mere bubble in a glass tube trusted, and what is level, seeing as the earth is a globe?
Is there a distance where level has to be re calculated, as I would forsee you ending up going out into space.
If compass North is used how do you accurately measure anything, as I understand compass North is constantly wandering about.
In the opinion of a surveyor, why are churchs commonly aligned along the aisle E/W, is there a common sense reason to do this?
We have jousted quite a lot over the term dead straight line, for a long time until you let slip that you were a surveyor, I had puzzled why you were so keen about my saying this, it became clear in a flash of course when you revealed your illustrious past, perhaps some things are meant to be, and as it is incumbant on me to prove about dead straight lines, I should come up against such a worthy person to have to prove to.
I look forward to the day when such proof can be presented to yourself, I have promised you it will, and it most definately will be.
Pete G, said that a straight line is half a circle, indeed this is a true statement, and as the moon glides around the earth, it will always bisect the earth in two at a precise spot, when this also directly aligns with the sun, so that a dead straight line is bisecting through all three globes, is the precise spot on the globes surface that will be very special.imo.
The Earth tips up and down on a reguler basis, so there will be several of these spots that are at the max/min points of this movement, would you consider that it is possible to draw these points of alignment on the globe, always remembering that it is spinning?
Each month, or bi-monthly, this spot will traverse up and down between the min/max points, have you ever heard of anyone carrying out such a survey?
Imagine , if these points matched anywhere that you are familer with.
Kevin
#14
Nigel
-
- Registered
- 321 posts
Megalithomaniac
- Interests:Avebury/Silbury
Posted 15 November 2006 - 07:19
-->QUOTE(kevin.b @ 14 November 2006, 22:04) <{POST_SNAPBACK}>
Nigel,
The lines I waffle on about appear to be non visual to human retina, but the constructions that have been sited and aligned to these non visable lines are evident in abundance, that is of course by a dowsing method of attaining alignment.
Surveyors have obviously been employed to set out the basic groundplans of these constructions.
What is the preferred method of alignment for surveyors, that is to start the basic orientation of a building?
Is a compass bearing used from compass north?
As for level, is a mere bubble in a glass tube trusted, and what is level, seeing as the earth is a globe?
Is there a distance where level has to be re calculated, as I would forsee you ending up going out into space.
If compass North is used how do you accurately measure anything, as I understand compass North is constantly wandering about.
In the opinion of a surveyor, why are churchs commonly aligned along the aisle E/W, is there a common sense reason to do this?
We have jousted quite a lot over the term dead straight line, for a long time until you let slip that you were a surveyor, I had puzzled why you were so keen about my saying this, it became clear in a flash of course when you revealed your illustrious past, perhaps some things are meant to be, and as it is incumbant on me to prove about dead straight lines, I should come up against such a worthy person to have to prove to.
I look forward to the day when such proof can be presented to yourself, I have promised you it will, and it most definately will be.
Pete G, said that a straight line is half a circle, indeed this is a true statement, and as the moon glides around the earth, it will always bisect the earth in two at a precise spot, when this also directly aligns with the sun, so that a dead straight line is bisecting through all three globes, is the precise spot on the globes surface that will be very special.imo.
The Earth tips up and down on a reguler basis, so there will be several of these spots that are at the max/min points of this movement, would you consider that it is possible to draw these points of alignment on the globe, always remembering that it is spinning?
Each month, or bi-monthly, this spot will traverse up and down between the min/max points, have you ever heard of anyone carrying out such a survey?
Imagine , if these points matched anywhere that you are familer with.
Kevin
[/quote]
Kevin,
You may have misunderstood my point. I inadvertently made an incorrect assertion. Since it was about the real world Pete was able to pick it up and correct it. In your dowsing world there is no such mechanism available.
There is one exception to this. A straight line claimed in dowsing world can be marked and recognised in the real world. It beats me why you haven't siezed on this.It would save you reams of unsuccessful persuasive words.
Walk in a dead straight line, up hill, down dale, preferably blindfolded, for several miles precisely following the dead straight ley lines you say exist. Time to do it. Desist from trying to persuade cynics who can't be persuaded because they can't see what you see. Astound them! Please.
#15
kevin.b
-
- Registered
- 521 posts
Megalithomaniac
Posted 15 November 2006 - 15:20
Nigel,
As I actually exist in the real world, I would greatly appreciate if you would drop the constant jibes about me not existing in a real world.
If there is a non real world, perhaps you could inform us of it?
Many things are not visable to our retina, but exist in the real world.
That which I detect is simply not recognised by science, mainly because they dont have the means to detect it, tough, they will have to do better.
I am working towards a system of displaying what I detect, and believe me, you will be the first to know about it.
As for wandering about blindfolded, I have explained before about the non sensical notion that this is, and I will not be performing in such a stupid way.
I can understand you looking for a method that would remove chance or any form of cheating.
If you know of a way of tracking the line that bisects the Earth, moon and sun, when they align, I would be gratefull of any assistance to pin point where these points are at each side of Earth, its just one straight line, of many.
How the dickens you would achieve such a measure I dont know, but I simply assumed that a surveyor maybe able to visualise this better than others?
If in a field, If I said that from a point 34 lines cross through that point,
If you had a screen around such a point, six feet high and say twenty foot diameter, and I marked points on both sides of such a screen, at a marked four foot height, or what ever height, what odds do you think I would be given for every mark been directly in line with the ones at the opposite side of the screen?, you could simply drill through, or hold two levels upwards.
Want to bet?.
Anytime ,Nigel, anytime,
it could be done with one board to start with, and you could move the board any amount sideways , whilst I was blindfolded, so that would keep you happy about me not seeing, only you would know how much you had moved the board, and unless I am a mind reader I wouldnt know, you could devise a method of knowing how much you moved the board, say you moved it twelve inchs, then my marks would need to be twelve inchs apart either side of the board.
You would though become bored of me achieving this to perfection
Kevin
As I actually exist in the real world, I would greatly appreciate if you would drop the constant jibes about me not existing in a real world.
If there is a non real world, perhaps you could inform us of it?
Many things are not visable to our retina, but exist in the real world.
That which I detect is simply not recognised by science, mainly because they dont have the means to detect it, tough, they will have to do better.
I am working towards a system of displaying what I detect, and believe me, you will be the first to know about it.
As for wandering about blindfolded, I have explained before about the non sensical notion that this is, and I will not be performing in such a stupid way.
I can understand you looking for a method that would remove chance or any form of cheating.
If you know of a way of tracking the line that bisects the Earth, moon and sun, when they align, I would be gratefull of any assistance to pin point where these points are at each side of Earth, its just one straight line, of many.
How the dickens you would achieve such a measure I dont know, but I simply assumed that a surveyor maybe able to visualise this better than others?
If in a field, If I said that from a point 34 lines cross through that point,
If you had a screen around such a point, six feet high and say twenty foot diameter, and I marked points on both sides of such a screen, at a marked four foot height, or what ever height, what odds do you think I would be given for every mark been directly in line with the ones at the opposite side of the screen?, you could simply drill through, or hold two levels upwards.
Want to bet?.
Anytime ,Nigel, anytime,
it could be done with one board to start with, and you could move the board any amount sideways , whilst I was blindfolded, so that would keep you happy about me not seeing, only you would know how much you had moved the board, and unless I am a mind reader I wouldnt know, you could devise a method of knowing how much you moved the board, say you moved it twelve inchs, then my marks would need to be twelve inchs apart either side of the board.
You would though become bored of me achieving this to perfection
Kevin
Reply to this topic
0 user(s) are reading this topic
0 members, 0 guests, 0 anonymous users
