davidjones, on 17 January 2010 - 22:17, said:
The problem I see with the pic as evidence for an alignment is there are only two components ,one natural and one man made if there were a third man made component it would have a lot more salience or if the angle of the capstone was oriented in the direction of Carn Kenidjack .Another problem is that the Carn is not particularly prominent in the view from the Quoit , it might even be lower in altitude . A similar local example might be the Boswens Common standing stone which would provide a view of the setting equinox sun (cloud permitting ) over the Carn but I wouldn't suggest it as being meaningful for the same reasons as above .
George











