5 replies to this topic

[lovuian]

My friends just got back from Stonehenge and well found something interesting

a Monolith inside the Sarsen stone

No kidding

Stonehenge and Monolith



I made a you tube so you can see the Monolith in the Sarsen stone
It looks just like the Monolith in 2001 Space Odyssey

I have a book on Stonehenge and I saw that in 1919 and in 1958
that some stones were moved and raised set in a bed of concrete
but no where did I see about the monolith inside the hollow Sarsen rock

Any articles on this would be very helpful

what I'm asking did they put a structure inside the rock to keep it up?
or is this just only seen by me

Thanks

[Pete G]

sorry but what you are look at is concrete used to repair a fallen stone that was re-erected in the 1950's,
PeteG

[lovuian]

Pete G, on 9 July 2009, 12:03, said:

sorry but what you are look at is concrete used to repair a fallen stone that was re-erected in the 1950's,
PeteG

Hey Pete
yes I saw
an article about the absolute disasterous work on Stonehenge in the 1900's
Visit My Website

Now I read and saw pictures of the stones reset and set in concrete but this doesn't look like CONCRETE
this looks like METAL looks like Iron deposits on it

I just don't know many concrete slabs which hold up for 50 years so well in snow rain and sleet

It really makes you wonder what they found in all those excavations and the publish works are a travesty


For decades the official Stonehenge guidebooks have been full of fascinating facts and figures and theories surrounding the world's greatest prehistoric monument. What the glossy brochures do not mention, however, is the systematic rebuilding of the 4,000 year old stone circle throughout the 20th Century.

This is one of the dark secrets of history archaeologists don't talk about: The day they had the builders in at Stonehenge to recreate the most famous ancient monument in Britain as they thought it ought to look.

The news is sensational,' said Mr Edwards, a decorate student at the University of the West of England. 'Once I realised how much work had been carried out, I was amazed to discover that practically no-one outside of the henge know of its reconstruction in the last 100 years. I have always thought that if people are bothering to make a trip to Stonehenge, from home or abroad, then the least they should expect is a true story.'

[lovuian]

Pete G, on 9 July 2009, 12:03, said:

sorry but what you are look at is concrete used to repair a fallen stone that was re-erected in the 1950's,
PeteG

Hey Pete do you have a link to which exact rock was re-erected
I know you are correct but I'm wanting to know about a SPECIFIC rock's repair

because that doesn't look like concrete to me?
that maybe the OFFICIAL story
that rock was Hollowed out for a reason
the inside looks like it has iron deposits on it
but I do see the same structure inside the other rocks

It just makes me mad the hollowed the rocks
I just wonder what concrete that is  Its pretty durable usually over the years concrete cracks from ice
Visit My Website

[Pete G]

I have checked that stone several times and I can vouch that it is just a concrete block.
The Mr Edwards you quoted previously is a very good friend of mine and I have checked with him and he confirms it.
The (un) publish records are down to Prof Atkinson.
Since his death a huge amount of material was found under his bed.
This is now being sorted by Cardiff uni.

There are some photos of the excavation on the english heritage website,
http://viewfinder.en.../...&placeName=
regards,
Pete

[Jimit]

Louvian, if you look at picture 232 on Pete's post above you will see people sitting in the hollow of the stone in question before it was stabilized by a concrete infill, No mysterious "Monolith" I'm afraid.
Jim.