No replies to this topic

[Ulf]

I happened to see that you have an article about my Atlantis theory here at the stones pages (August 14, 2004 I believe). Unfortunately, the story was based on two articles that were of low journalistic quality, and one of them (The Guardian) has even printed a correction later. So let me suggest that you issue a more correct and informative news alert.

You can find information at www.AtlantisInIreland.com and if you wish I can give you an up to date press release.

Incidentally, since the theory has been published there has not been any relevant criticism of it (the scholars on Ireland spoke out of obvious ignorance, at least as they were quoted, but given the way I was misquoted, and the National Museum of Ireland's statement was turned to its opposite, I wouldn't trust those quotes). I am willing to debate the theory with anyone who adheres to the scientific paradigm (I'm not interested to argue with persons using irrelevant argument, such as questioning my motifs rather than my arguments).

July 11 to 13 it will be presented at an international conference in Greece, Atlantis 2005.

There has of course also been new data added since August last year, so that the North Sea seems ever more interesting from an archaeological point of view.

Finally I'd like to issue a warning for two Myths that both cranks and scholars in general have fallen for, that Atlantis was an advanced civilisation, and that stone age man was primitive. Neither is true.