Stonehenge
Started by Tristan, 2-Aug-2006 15:07
20 replies to this topic
#4
Posted 6 October 2006 - 18:41
Six or seven I think, but although it’s still great to be there, it’s not quite the same now with the restrictions imposed on the stones. Yes I know the reasons why, but having been one of the lucky people to have visited long ago before the barriers went up, there is obviously a different ambiance.
#7
Posted 21 October 2006 - 21:07
I've never been to England. I would like to go for a tour some day.
Could Stonehenge have been a mound at one time?
The setting sun would illuminate a passage on winter solstice.
Maybe a much larger version of Maeshowe http://www.maeshowe....showeabout.html
Could Stonehenge have been a mound at one time?
The setting sun would illuminate a passage on winter solstice.
Maybe a much larger version of Maeshowe http://www.maeshowe....showeabout.html
#8
Posted 22 October 2006 - 04:32
I've been twice and driven past another two times(if that counts). The alignments and theories continue to hold my attention, as do other as yet fully explained ancient sites. Yes I've also wondered if the whole complex could have been covered by a mound that has since eroded (or been removed).
The ambience that exists causes a feeling of awe, much the same feeling comes over one when approaching natural monoliths. Particularly very large ones as in Ayres Rock in Central Australia. Native populations treated such formations as sacred places. Certainly it would hold one in awe at its ability to "predict" astronomical events. Has Stonehenge become a man made sacred site? Or was it one all along?
The ambience that exists causes a feeling of awe, much the same feeling comes over one when approaching natural monoliths. Particularly very large ones as in Ayres Rock in Central Australia. Native populations treated such formations as sacred places. Certainly it would hold one in awe at its ability to "predict" astronomical events. Has Stonehenge become a man made sacred site? Or was it one all along?
#10
Posted 27 November 2006 - 15:25
In my view a very over-rated site....okay, i know its World Heritage and all that, but I'd much rather go to Avebury! its got more 'atmosphere'
Stanton Drew is another place I've been to - once, and Avebury, several times.
Tim Darvill @ Bournemouth is/has developed/ing a new interpretation about Stonehenge - I kinda know where he's coming from, but I'm not convinced of that either...
regards
rockartshaman
Stanton Drew is another place I've been to - once, and Avebury, several times.
Tim Darvill @ Bournemouth is/has developed/ing a new interpretation about Stonehenge - I kinda know where he's coming from, but I'm not convinced of that either...
regards
rockartshaman
#12 Guest_Garry Denke_*
Posted 2 June 2007 - 11:37
Twelve glorious times, Vote for Stonehenge!
Department for Culture Media & Sport
2-4 Cockspur Street
London
SW1Y 5DH
020 7211 6200
EMAILED THRICE
enquiries@culture.gov.uk
enquiries@thenationaltrust.org.uk
customers@english-heritage.org.uk
UK CHARITY GROUPS QUESTION
http://www.theyworkf...om/user/?u=3440
In April of 1985 A Texas Tycoon offered to finance a new Stonehenge visitor centre and a 2.4-mile (4km) long bored tunnel under Stonehenge provided that: (a) UNESCO list the monument as a World Heritage Site by the following year (1986), and that; (b) Her Majesty's Government Highways Agency remove the A344 paved road beside the monument and all of the artefacts beneath the Heelstone. In November of 1986 UNESCO listed Stonehenge, Avebury and Associated Sites as agreed and by 1989 A Texas Tycoon's improvement scheme for the A303 trunk road was put on Her Majesty's Government Roads Programme. Fifty (50) possible routes plus A Texas Tycoon's 2.4-mile (4km) twin bored tunnel scheme and new Stonehenge visitor centre were considered prior to a public consultation. Highways Agency held a Planning Conference in November of 1995 at which time it was recommended that THE ONLY ACCEPTABLE SCHEME to all of the UK Charity Groups was A Texas Tycoon's April of 1985 plan. In November of 1996 this only acceptable scheme was withdrawn from the Roads Programme because Her Majesty's Government was too embarrassed to accept the charitable financing offered by A Texas Tycoon. My question to all of the UK Charity Groups this coming New Year (2008) is: Do you still want to construct a new Stonehenge visitor centre and a 2.4-mile (4km) dual carriageway under Stonehenge; because their $2.0 billion (£1.0 billion) estimated cost was not, and is not, an issue.
http://www.theyworkf...07-12-18a.221.1
FUNDS VERIFIED IN AVENUE BANKS
http://countyclerkre...d9-71b09a3e8863
http://countyclerkre...d9-71b09a3e8863
Thank you and Happy New Year.
Garry W. Denke
Geologist/Geophysicist
A Texas Tycoon Sole Proprietor
Wildcat Station, P.O. Box 866488
Plano, Texas 75086-6488
Tel: 972-422-8268
Fax: 972-422-7868
Cell: 972-768-4631
http://www.garrydenke.com
http://www.denocoinc.com
USA
Department for Culture Media & Sport
2-4 Cockspur Street
London
SW1Y 5DH
020 7211 6200
EMAILED THRICE
enquiries@culture.gov.uk
enquiries@thenationaltrust.org.uk
customers@english-heritage.org.uk
UK CHARITY GROUPS QUESTION
http://www.theyworkf...om/user/?u=3440
In April of 1985 A Texas Tycoon offered to finance a new Stonehenge visitor centre and a 2.4-mile (4km) long bored tunnel under Stonehenge provided that: (a) UNESCO list the monument as a World Heritage Site by the following year (1986), and that; (b) Her Majesty's Government Highways Agency remove the A344 paved road beside the monument and all of the artefacts beneath the Heelstone. In November of 1986 UNESCO listed Stonehenge, Avebury and Associated Sites as agreed and by 1989 A Texas Tycoon's improvement scheme for the A303 trunk road was put on Her Majesty's Government Roads Programme. Fifty (50) possible routes plus A Texas Tycoon's 2.4-mile (4km) twin bored tunnel scheme and new Stonehenge visitor centre were considered prior to a public consultation. Highways Agency held a Planning Conference in November of 1995 at which time it was recommended that THE ONLY ACCEPTABLE SCHEME to all of the UK Charity Groups was A Texas Tycoon's April of 1985 plan. In November of 1996 this only acceptable scheme was withdrawn from the Roads Programme because Her Majesty's Government was too embarrassed to accept the charitable financing offered by A Texas Tycoon. My question to all of the UK Charity Groups this coming New Year (2008) is: Do you still want to construct a new Stonehenge visitor centre and a 2.4-mile (4km) dual carriageway under Stonehenge; because their $2.0 billion (£1.0 billion) estimated cost was not, and is not, an issue.
http://www.theyworkf...07-12-18a.221.1
FUNDS VERIFIED IN AVENUE BANKS
http://countyclerkre...d9-71b09a3e8863
http://countyclerkre...d9-71b09a3e8863
Thank you and Happy New Year.
Garry W. Denke
Geologist/Geophysicist
A Texas Tycoon Sole Proprietor
Wildcat Station, P.O. Box 866488
Plano, Texas 75086-6488
Tel: 972-422-8268
Fax: 972-422-7868
Cell: 972-768-4631
http://www.garrydenke.com
http://www.denocoinc.com
USA
Reply to this topic
0 user(s) are reading this topic
0 members, 0 guests, 0 anonymous users











