Home

ARCHIVES
(5805 articles):
 

EDITORIAL TEAM:
 
Clive Price-Jones 
Diego Meozzi 
Paola Arosio 
Philip Hansen 
Wolf Thandoy 


If you think our news service is a valuable resource, please consider a donation. Select your currency and click the PayPal button:



Main Index
Podcast


Archaeo News 

31 May 2010
Survey of 500 estate agents value Stonehenge at £51m

Sell Stonehenge? A survey of 500 British estate agents has placed the price of the ancient stone circle at a cool £51 million. It's a drop in the ocean of the £156 billion gap between British government income and expenditure. But it's a start. Okay, so we're not really advocating putting one of Britain's most prized historic monuments up for sale. The survey does shed light on just how much heritage sites are worth. But are the sums on Stonehenge correct? Shouldn't such an internationally-renowned, popular and iconic monument be worth much more?
     Counting just the 18 large standing stones, the 10 giant stones of the inner circle and the central altar stone at Stonehenge, by a very unscientific breakdown, that £51 million price tag on the Neolithic monument gives its 29 key constituent parts an approximate value of just £1.7 million a piece. Theoretically speaking, don't these figures at least suggest the total price tag should be a bit higher? Surely a super-wealthy antiquities collector would be prepared to pay megabucks to have a Stonehenge megalith in their living room? Or possibly even a trilith framing their front door?
     And what about admission fees? Stonehenge presently attracts around 900,000 visitors a year, at an average price of about £5 per head. Multiply that long-term - by 25 years, say - and that means the monument is worth over £112 million. Consider too that visitor figures will most likely increase in years to come, and factor in revenue from merchandising, and £51 million begins to sound like a snip.
     Nigel Lewis, a property analyst at FindaProperty.com, who ran the survey, commented. "There was a surprising amount of agreement between the different agents we spoke to." Clearly estate agents have done their sums, too. They consider many different factors when it comes to judging the value of a property - location, age, whether it's in need of improvement and so on.
     Stonehenge doesn't lack for a good spot, situated on sheep-nibbled rolling Wiltshire countryside. But at 4,500 years vintage it could hardly be described as a new build, while its state of repair is questionable to say the least. And then there's that ugly car park plonked right across the road since the 1960s (although it's soon to be removed). Also, unless Stonehenge's new owners were to scrap already scaled-down plans for a new visitor centre - current cost £25 million - then that's a big chunk of change they'll need to lay out.
     Someone buying a historic British monument isn't actually as ridiculous as it sounds. Missourian businessman Robert P. McCulloch in 1968 purchased the old 19th century London Bridge designed by engineer John Rennie from the City of London for $2 million dollars. He shipped it to the United States, where it was rebuilt across Lake Havasu in Arizona as the gateway to a mock-English community.

Source: The Independent on Sunday (26 May 2010)

Share this webpage:


Copyright Statement
Publishing system powered by Movable Type 2.63

HOMESHOPTOURSPREHISTORAMAFORUMSGLOSSARYMEGALINKSFEEDBACKFAQABOUT US TOP OF PAGE ^^^