| 1 June 2009
Skeleton found in India pushes back leprosy's origins
Leprosy has been with us a lot longer than we thought. In a new study, researchers report the discovery of a 4000-year-old skeleton in India with the hallmark ravages of the disease. The find pushes back the origins of leprosy at least 1500 years and gives clues to how the disease spread across the globe.
Until now, the earliest, widely accepted evidence for leprosy has been from South Asian texts dating to the 6th century BCE. The Vedas, the sacred writings of Hinduism, mention what could be leprosy near the end of the second millennium BCE. Now it appears that the Vedic texts were accurate. A team of Indian and U.S. scientists reports finding signs of leprosy in a skeleton buried about 4000 years ago in northwest India.
The skeleton was found during excavations of a site called Balathal in Rajasthan. There, a settlement of copper-working people lived in stone or mud-brick huts and grew barley. The bones were buried in ash from cow dung in a thick-walled stone enclosure on the edge of the settlement. Radiocarbon dating indicated the skeleton, a male in his late 30s, was buried between 2500 and 2000 BCE.
Although the skeleton was fragmentary, researchers found erosion and pitting of the bone around the nose and cheeks as well as in the ribs, vertebrae, and limbs. Loss of bone around the nose and destruction of the nasal spine is a hallmark of leprosy, say the authors, led by anthropologist Gwen Robbins of Appalachian State University in Boone, North Carolina. The authors say they were able to rule out the other most likely explanations for the man's condition, namely, tuberculosis or a bone infection.
The report sheds light on where leprosy emerged and how it found its way around the globe. A genomic analysis in 2005 suggested that the disease could have first spread with the emergence of modern humans from East Africa; other researchers have suggested more recent origins. The authors favor the notion that leprosy appeared in the 3rd millennium BCE, possibly in India, as urbanization and trade routes grew, because close contact between humans is needed for disease transmission.
Ron Pinhasi, a biological anthropologist who studies paleopathology at University College Cork in Ireland agrees with that interpretation. "The Balathal case... fits well with our scenario and is an important contribution to current knowledge," he says. Helen D. Donoghue, an infectious disease specialist at University College London, said the new finding was fascinating and fit in with the theory that Alexander's army had brought leprosy back from its campaigns in India. Dr. Robbins said she planned to extract ancient bacterial DNA from the Indian skeleton and hoped it might resolve how the disease originated.
Source: The New York Times (26 May 2009), Science Now (27 May 2009)
Share this webpage: